John L. Sandy, Spirit Lake, IA, attorney and arbitrator states in recorded telephone conversation with a friend concerning his ‘arbitration’ of Iowa Administrative Judge Susan Ackerman,
“…It went perfectly well for me. I get paid…in fact, I got paid to drive three and a half hours this morning that I didn’t drive…”
Heitshusen, Sonya, “Attorney Caught on Tape Raises Ethical Questions”, whotv.com, May 19, 2016, pages 1 & 2, Web, August 17, 2016.
“…but the real indication of a political motivations by Sandy (who upheld the firing of Iowa Administrative Judge Susan Ackerman) came in a telephone conversation he (John Sandy) had after the hearing on Ackerman’s case…accused Ackerman of ‘badmouthing the new administration’ and said he (John Sandy) had read of her case in the newspaper, which could give him a preconceived opinion on how he should rule. At the hearing he (John Sandy) claimed to know nothing about the case. He (John Sandy) also boasted of being paid to drive three and a half hours, which he said he had not driven…”
Rekha Basu, “State Worker Firing Raise Questions of Political Bias”, Des Moines Register, August 19, 2016 7:02 p.m.CDT, pages 1-3, Web, August 22, 2016.
The family of Lincoln D. Belken knows all-too-well the ‘money-oriented ethics’ and mediocre to abysmally poor legal skills of John L. Sandy of Spirit Lake, IA. We know all-too-well John L. Sandy’s failure to adequately represent his innocent client. The family knows John L. Sandy literally threw his client Lincoln D. Belken under the proverbial prison bus. Through John Sandy’s courtroom incompetence or perhaps something more sinister, he ensured all alibi witnesses were discredited by not allowing them to testify to the truth.
More to Come
Vickie A. Larsen
So who was the friend John Sandy was talking to?*
*John Sandy, Spirit Lake Attorney/Arbitrator was disciplined and suspended for six months arising out of his actions regarding Iowa Administrative Judge Susan Ackerman by Iowa PERB (public employment relations board).
Justice For Lincoln 
I see you don’t monetize justice4lincoln.com, don’t waste your
traffic, you can earn extra cash every month with new monetization method.
This is the best adsense alternative for
any type of website (they approve all sites), for more details simply search
in gooogle: murgrabia’s tools
LikeLike
Didn’t they have a DNA match?
LikeLike
Yes, but the young man was kept in a jail that had the sheriff’s department changing the sheets. The State Lab came up with inconclusive match because there were more than one contributors and it wasn’t until the county attorney sent the alleged sample to a private lab which had only been in business for a month, that lab director found a pure sample that the state lab did not. Sir it is extremely easy to transfer a dna sample from one surface to another. You just need some saline solution on a cotton sway and a sample can be transferred to any surface.
LikeLike
DNA is very easy to transfer and potentially falsify. This is also the same reason on why it as able to be tested. In order to obtain view said DNA it would have to be transferred onto a slide. Reading up on the appeal asked for. The courts aligned with the method for testing and only lightly touched on the ability of the individual to actually perform the test. To put it specifically, you would not want a nurse performing and leading a surgery on you even though they may have assisted on many surgeries similar. You would want a doctor to perform said surgery as they have met many qualifications by approved institutes to do so. Even at that how many people seek second opinions from other doctors? They might get the answer they want from another doctor but does that make it the right answer then becomes the question. Especially if the result ends up being more in line with the first doctors analysis.
Also it could be noted there was another witness that could have solidified the testimony of the defendants wife. this could have been used to refute the prosecutions last minute witness whose testimony’s sole purpose was to impeach his wife’s. If this other witness was allowed to testify, would have basically impeached their testimony pointed at impeachment. They then would have had to prove that the specific conversation between the defendants wife and her jobs manager ever actually took place. If they could prove that. Then they could prove prosecutorial misconduct by the state not making sure that their last minute witnesses testimony was actually valid. I believe there are more faults to be found if the state were to reopen and dig deeper into its own investigation and prosecution.
LikeLike
Dear Abe-Yes the Iowa DCI lab came back that there were multiple contributions, Ned Bjornstad send another sample off to a brand new testing lab in St Louis which was not accredited and add to that the ‘sample’ was kept in DCI Klooster’s office desk drawer which was not climate controlled.
LikeLike